I’m reading Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, and some lines knock me out for half an evening.

So I read it with an LLM on the side. I photograph a page from my couch and ask what one line means. Even Fable struggles with some of them. More than once I’ve asked it to explain the explanation ๐Ÿ˜„

Somewhere between two of those photos it hit me what this replaces. A question about one specific line used to mean going to a university, catching a professor in a good mood, and hoping the mood stretched as far as propositions 6.34โ€“6.36 that day. Two hopes, stacked. Now the answer lands before I’ve shifted on the couch.

But the instant answer is the smaller half.

The tip that actually improved my reasoning: don’t ask for the explanation first. Explain the line yourself โ€” your version, wrong parts included โ€” then let the model correct you. An answer tells you what the line means. A correction shows you exactly where your own thinking bent.

A professor’s good mood used to be the price of being wrong in front of someone who knew better. Now it’s free, at any hour, on any couch.